ex cathedra: What's a country for?

Saturday, October 12, 2013

What's a country for?

If it's a White country, its current purpose is to exemplify a space of land inhabited by as many differing, competing, opposing and mutually distrustful, inimical and irreconcilably hostile groups as possible.

This is called "multiculturalism", where Diversity Is Our Strength.

The older notion of a country as a place for people of similar race, language, culture, religion, etc. is clearly mistaken.

(Unless it's a non-White country. In this case it must be preserved at all costs.)

Have I got this right?

--

2 comments:

Anonymous said...: One night, I mentioned at the dinner table that John Jay had given the first demographic definition of America: essentially, an ethnically-diverse, primarily-English European country across the ocean from Europe proper. I then wondered out loud if people who were from civilizations with basic assumptions and ideas of governance that were not in alignment with America's could ever truly integrate into American society.

Based on the facial expressions of everyone present, you would've thought that I had just said that Hitler was right about something.

This coming from people who identify themselves as "conservatives."

-Sean; 12:20 PM, October 12, 2013
OreamnosAmericanus said...: One of the reasons I no longer describe myself as conservative.; 6:02 PM, October 12, 2013

Post a Comment

Toward Our Future

What the sons of Europa need is a new religion: one that is as tribal, portable and survivalist as Judaism, as masculine, terrestrial and tough as Islam and as intellectually and aesthetically creative as Christianity...with a dose of the unflinching realism of the ancestral ways of the Greeks and Romans, Germans and Celts and Slavs..And for the larger Indo-European frame, something of the Indian capacity to combine an ultimate and philosophical realization of The One with a robustly mytho-poetic religion on-the-ground. Oh, and some of the psychological acumen of Buddhism.

Liberalism's Basic Flaw

Liberals believe that the chief role of the State is to force everyone to be equal, (ie, take vengeance on the successful). So when they are confronted with any group that they deem less well off than themselves, they are morally disarmed, completely and utterly. Any group that can achieve Victim Status is on their way to power and the (White) liberal's only job is to give them what they want, no matter how much that damages him. And nothing may ever be expected, much less demanded, of them in return. It's a recipe for suicide: no other outcome is possible.