ex cathedra: Too true, 2

Friday, January 28, 2011

Too true, 2

From my good friend L, this quote from "Friedman" --not sure which one, but it's spot on.

One of the most extraordinary examples of adaptation to immaturity in contemporary American society today is how the word "abusive" has replaced the words "nasty" or "objectionable". (1999)

1 comment:

Anonymous said...: Isn't "nasty" the proper 'dynamic equavalent' translation of the Latin "abusus," with "vanilla" as the dynamic equivalent of the Latin "usus"?

Abusus non tollit usum. (Nastiness grows routine. The routinization of nastiness. Transgressing the boundaries of vanilla is ultimately not worth the effort. One might as well sublimate from the beginning.); 1:10 PM, January 29, 2011

Post a Comment

Toward Our Future

What the sons of Europa need is a new religion: one that is as tribal, portable and survivalist as Judaism, as masculine, terrestrial and tough as Islam and as intellectually and aesthetically creative as Christianity...with a dose of the unflinching realism of the ancestral ways of the Greeks and Romans, Germans and Celts and Slavs..And for the larger Indo-European frame, something of the Indian capacity to combine an ultimate and philosophical realization of The One with a robustly mytho-poetic religion on-the-ground. Oh, and some of the psychological acumen of Buddhism.

Liberalism's Basic Flaw

Liberals believe that the chief role of the State is to force everyone to be equal, (ie, take vengeance on the successful). So when they are confronted with any group that they deem less well off than themselves, they are morally disarmed, completely and utterly. Any group that can achieve Victim Status is on their way to power and the (White) liberal's only job is to give them what they want, no matter how much that damages him. And nothing may ever be expected, much less demanded, of them in return. It's a recipe for suicide: no other outcome is possible.