If you can mandate racial hires for firemen, why not for doctors?
Oh, that wouldn't make you feel confident? Too risky when your life is at stake?
Here's a report with actual examples from the test that these guys can't pass.
Quote:
Oh, that wouldn't make you feel confident? Too risky when your life is at stake?
Here's a report with actual examples from the test that these guys can't pass.
Quote:
Judge Garaufis promptly rules that two of every five new firefighters hired must be black and one Hispanic — as opposed to the old, racist system, which required that five of every five be minimally competent/not retarded (clearly privileging whites).
Any wonder why the otherwise saintly and humanitarian Ex Cathedra has lost every last drop of sympathy for (or guilt about) NAMS?
*Non-Asian Minorities. A new acronym I just learned. I like to share.
****
1 comment:
The pressure is intense, for two reasons: 1. It's a political plum, made for the "politics of intercession/identity" 2. It's one of the few non-college jobs you can do with barely a year's training that will pay a Union salary/benefits.
Plus firefighters have virtually none of the political baggage that cops do. And more and more there are fewer and fewer actual fires to go to.
Post a Comment