Curiously enough or not, js8448 the number on the side of the bus, is 'estate' state TWR. 1Chr. 17:17.
But if the NT is sought, then nt844 automatos (self-teaching -- 2x. Mark 4:28 the earth's spontaneous production of fruit [a meaning of AB js4] and the iron gate open'd by self Acts 12:10. + nt8 Abiathar father sc green man (AB js1-4 green) of js3148 profit sc surplus value via prophets. The "ROSS" across the street sc js7493 ROSh an undulating waving field of grain.
If that's a 197 on the front of the bus, then nt197 akbribesteron, which could mean 'straiter' or rather strait sc path cf 196 as "most straitest.
The bus cybernetes seems to have no upper head, sc is a non-ego automaton?
BTW, I hope conservative imperialist Americans realize that if they elect a non-POC Republican president in November, the MSM and the Global Community won't basically acquiesce in continuing with the "kill list."
They'll treat any Romney Administration kill list as if it were done by Bush-Cheney, and not interpret it as "test" of President Obama's principles (NYT) or say that it "may present the most important test of human rights principles in the Obama era" (The Nation).
In a related line of considerations, if it weren't for that darn Hitler, we could condemn Churchill and FDR (mock'd fat wife; New Deal didn't help blacks; imposed rule of 'sons of bitches' of his own selection on Latin America; etc) as imperialists for Anglo-Saxony. As it is, we are stuck with having to praise these guys for their contributions to defeating Hitler. ... I wish women would quit holding up their half of the sky.
Re the P.S. I'm not sure that the link provides evidence for dissent from equalness, at least if such dissent pertains to a distinction between noble and base, e.g. Heidegger's distinction between genuinely authentic and ingenuinely authentic or Sartrean essence-less thus pseudo-existing Selfs.
The scramble for prestige in the career structures and educational structures that the link focuses on doesn't deny that all individuals and groups want the same and are the same (the ideal of the last men proposed by Zarathustra in Prologiue ¶5). Individuals and groups perform unequally in SAT and LSAT etc, but all individuals and groups are look to the same standard of excellence, namely SAT performance. We are not even particularly interested whether Jews and northern oriental Asians perform better than Gentile whites because of genetics or the luck of familial cultures or individual hard work, even though volition and thus moral merit seems more relevant to 'individual hard work' than to genetics and the luck of the familial culture one is thrown into. (Although admittedly the ability to work hard may be as much determined by genetics and familial culture as any other quality: Kant said free will is empirically unsearchable, eh?)
A distinction between noble and base does seem to occur in the world with the mutual valuational tension between white higher man and white lower man. Perhaps each class holds a contemptible value system, and has no real self-reverence.
I doubt that higher man whites have no serious reverence for 'other' value systems à la native American spirituality or Buddhism etc, since their efforts along these lines seem so laughable it's as if their preceptors are setting them up for a drama of contemptibleness. Even Simone Weil seems to fall into absurdity: as a matter of principle, she must dismiss the Reformation (perhaps because of its admittedly very slight openness to the Old Testament, as Nietzsche also grudgingly noted), but then she must cease pouring contempt upon nonRC Western Christianity when she encounters African Americans' evangelical Christianity even though it isn't contemplative spiritualness or whatever it was she fancy'd she liked in Catholicism and could be elided into the Upanishads. ... I'm too culturally remote from low-class whites to detect whether they have anything of real Christian faith in their evangelicalism etc or if it is driven really only by ressentiment against their despisers. As low-class white Christians get educated they ascend in class along the south-north axis and their Christianity becomes social justice spirituality, environmentalist spirituality, etc.
Or for instance, do Reform Jews and Lubavitcher Jews agree that their Judaisms are equally good? simply two different but equal in value paths up the same mountain and with the same religious result?
In contrast, that random evolution seems to have resulted in Jewish and Gentile white propulation groups performing unequally on IQ tests etc is no threat at all to the ideal "Everyone wants the same, everyone is the same."
Nietzsche dismisses the Germanic ersatz value distinction "simple base, develop'dness noble" (Genealogy 1 ¶4; BGE ¶244; Dawn of Morning ¶231; Gay Science ¶357f) -- no true distinction is made, the complexify'd, develop'dness, becomingness-plus "noble" doesn't dare more truth (Ecce Homo, Preface ¶3.
One could take the Boas skoo's reverent humble valuational value-neutralness before primitive cultures as just as good as our complex culture in the direction of "1001 Goals." What does a people revere thanks to its founders? Zarathustra's examples are in a way simple, though admittedly the more intelligent a population is then in general the more one can do with such a population for its value tables, although this holds also for other mental or psychical richnesses, e.g., musical ability, imaginative ability, verbal ability, sense of humour. ...
9 comments:
Looks to me more like "Equality for Ali [caliph of Egypt] [to rule]."
Curiously enough or not, js8448 the number on the side of the bus, is 'estate' state TWR. 1Chr. 17:17.
But if the NT is sought, then nt844 automatos (self-teaching -- 2x. Mark 4:28 the earth's spontaneous production of fruit [a meaning of AB js4] and the iron gate open'd by self Acts 12:10. + nt8 Abiathar father sc green man (AB js1-4 green) of js3148 profit sc surplus value via prophets. The "ROSS" across the street sc js7493 ROSh an undulating waving field of grain.
If that's a 197 on the front of the bus, then nt197 akbribesteron, which could mean 'straiter' or rather strait sc path cf 196 as "most straitest.
The bus cybernetes seems to have no upper head, sc is a non-ego automaton?
To be in a bus is to be confined in shame (js954 BWsh) e.g. Isaiah 1:29. ... Maybe to be thrown under the BWSh isn't exactly free from shame either?
grrrrrr.
America said...
Ibn through the dessert on a horse with no real presence.
BTW, I hope conservative imperialist Americans realize that if they elect a non-POC Republican president in November, the MSM and the Global Community won't basically acquiesce in continuing with the "kill list."
They'll treat any Romney Administration kill list as if it were done by Bush-Cheney, and not interpret it as "test" of President Obama's principles (NYT) or say that it "may present the most important test of human rights principles in the Obama era" (The Nation).
In a related line of considerations, if it weren't for that darn Hitler, we could condemn Churchill and FDR (mock'd fat wife; New Deal didn't help blacks; imposed rule of 'sons of bitches' of his own selection on Latin America; etc) as imperialists for Anglo-Saxony. As it is, we are stuck with having to praise these guys for their contributions to defeating Hitler. ... I wish women would quit holding up their half of the sky.
Re the P.S. I'm not sure that the link provides evidence for dissent from equalness, at least if such dissent pertains to a distinction between noble and base, e.g. Heidegger's distinction between genuinely authentic and ingenuinely authentic or Sartrean essence-less thus pseudo-existing Selfs.
The scramble for prestige in the career structures and educational structures that the link focuses on doesn't deny that all individuals and groups want the same and are the same (the ideal of the last men proposed by Zarathustra in Prologiue ¶5). Individuals and groups perform unequally in SAT and LSAT etc, but all individuals and groups are look to the same standard of excellence, namely SAT performance. We are not even particularly interested whether Jews and northern oriental Asians perform better than Gentile whites because of genetics or the luck of familial cultures or individual hard work, even though volition and thus moral merit seems more relevant to 'individual hard work' than to genetics and the luck of the familial culture one is thrown into. (Although admittedly the ability to work hard may be as much determined by genetics and familial culture as any other quality: Kant said free will is empirically unsearchable, eh?)
A distinction between noble and base does seem to occur in the world with the mutual valuational tension between white higher man and white lower man. Perhaps each class holds a contemptible value system, and has no real self-reverence.
I doubt that higher man whites have no serious reverence for 'other' value systems à la native American spirituality or Buddhism etc, since their efforts along these lines seem so laughable it's as if their preceptors are setting them up for a drama of contemptibleness. Even Simone Weil seems to fall into absurdity: as a matter of principle, she must dismiss the Reformation (perhaps because of its admittedly very slight openness to the Old Testament, as Nietzsche also grudgingly noted), but then she must cease pouring contempt upon nonRC Western Christianity when she encounters African Americans' evangelical Christianity even though it isn't contemplative spiritualness or whatever it was she fancy'd she liked in Catholicism and could be elided into the Upanishads. ... I'm too culturally remote from low-class whites to detect whether they have anything of real Christian faith in their evangelicalism etc or if it is driven really only by ressentiment against their despisers. As low-class white Christians get educated they ascend in class along the south-north axis and their Christianity becomes social justice spirituality, environmentalist spirituality, etc.
Or for instance, do Reform Jews and Lubavitcher Jews agree that their Judaisms are equally good? simply two different but equal in value paths up the same mountain and with the same religious result?
In contrast, that random evolution seems to have resulted in Jewish and Gentile white propulation groups performing unequally on IQ tests etc is no threat at all to the ideal "Everyone wants the same, everyone is the same."
Nietzsche dismisses the Germanic ersatz value distinction "simple base, develop'dness noble" (Genealogy 1 ¶4; BGE ¶244; Dawn of Morning ¶231; Gay Science ¶357f) -- no true distinction is made, the complexify'd, develop'dness, becomingness-plus "noble" doesn't dare more truth (Ecce Homo, Preface ¶3.
One could take the Boas skoo's reverent humble valuational value-neutralness before primitive cultures as just as good as our complex culture in the direction of "1001 Goals." What does a people revere thanks to its founders? Zarathustra's examples are in a way simple, though admittedly the more intelligent a population is then in general the more one can do with such a population for its value tables, although this holds also for other mental or psychical richnesses, e.g., musical ability, imaginative ability, verbal ability, sense of humour. ...
Post a Comment