but this time, they're right.
I knew it was Nazis who created feminism.
The mystery of Betty Friedan's hideousness.
And the real inner truth about Gloria Steinem.
__
I knew it was Nazis who created feminism.
The mystery of Betty Friedan's hideousness.
And the real inner truth about Gloria Steinem.
__
9 comments:
One thing the founding documents of the Italian and German fascist parties had in common: votes for women.
Reductio ad Hitlerum: You know, just the other day I was standing in a long grocery check-out line and decided to ponder whether there was some way for our liberals/progressives to refute the charge that they don't welcome otherness or the other as such but only the already us, good other or good otherness, and reject the really other other a.k.a. Adolf Hitler.
What about this: why is there otherness as such, rather than nothing objectionable? How does unjust exclusion etc occur to begin with? Because of us, who do a bunch of rejection and exclusion in order to create and then perpetuate a bunch of unjust privileges of race and gender? That is, because of the Adolf Hitler in us, or because ultimately we are Adolf Hitler. So the other otherness, the bad unjust otherness really isn't other but we. Inclusiveness thus requires excluding the Adolf Hitler in us that causes unjust exclusion of the good other.
This argument seems Q.E.D. sound.
The only possible absurdity involves class, inasmuch as the unjust exclusioners (who deem good persons 'other' by reason of race and gender orientation etc) are low-class us (cf the bunch of ugly white male haters confined in the mountain of hate in Buckaroo Bansai movie), not high-class us who via white privilege and male privilege and homphobia privilege etc founded the power and injustice institutions of western civilization.
The gambit for this problem is to note that c.1950 we (our externalized Adolf Hitler, also Cromwell, Torquemada, Nietzsche, Augustine [social climber from Canaanite Africa to European Rome], Calvin, Luther, Pius 12, Heidegger, et al) decided to start becoming inclusive and thus, essentially, to exclude the excluder or the Adolf Hitler in us.
Low-class whites did populist resistance against this justice movement. As low-class they seem to have some claim to justice. Except that below them are the 'classes' of POCs and also white women consider'd as a class (not as a gender), as in the interpretations done by radfems.
What I mean is that because some population groups are lower than low-class whites, low-class whites have no possible real claim to justice by class position. Marx himself despised low-class white Lumpenproles.
Since we must accept the other as is, in his otherness, we the welcomers of others have to change ourselves. We must not indicate to the other the essence of his otherness.
Buckaroo Banzai, a Cross for the Eighth ?Demons'Zion [effem eights sc 88, before seeing the 1 juggler setting up 188 sc will-to-power obedience training as re Nietzsche BGE 188]
-saiban in Japanese means justice, trial; so this is chop'd and bakwards'd justice preparation?
'Banzai' (Japanese for 'hurrah!' will obviously suggest to Anglo-Saxony bonsai [lit. tray plant] a method of »dichtunging« a tree (root system within the mountain of 'hate' of Red Lectoids). cf 'saibai': growing cultivation sc culture.
Buckaroo, cowboy from S.J. vaquero, in japanese bokeru "out of focus, blurry, senile [sc Self Nile, egyptian senex selfing]."
quotation in movie: »I speak Spanish to God, French to women, English to men, and Japanese to my whores/Horus [sun son; deaf solar itch js2775f, 2790ff].«
-This is a revision of statement by Holy Roman Emperor Carlos V (hostile to Reformation and Luther): "I speak Spanish to God, Italian to women, French to men, and German to my horse." The last presumably indicates his horsemen, knights by attaching the Je from the beginning of the statement line: sc chevalJe —> chevalier, knight. This guess feels confirm'd by the "Jepa" japa that can be composed by adding the subesequent p in the original line by Carlos V "Je parle espagnol à Dieu, italien aux femmes, français aux hommes, et allemand à mon cheval."
Hebrew-wise we must consider Bu (house) + carib js2717 ChRB waste(d) cf 'carib' cannibal sc cana lord & QRB 7128, 7138 battle neighbour + NSI js5265 migration (pulling up roots and moving on; philistine palestinian rollers-onward). Sc House of Canaanite Palestinians next door to the Sufis?
Or possibly "carbon sigh" imitation (carbon copy: life in carbon element) sigh.
Other possibilities:
-BQR 1239ff plow, enquire; dawn;
-BKR 1060ff, 1069ff firstling;
-BChR 970, 977 choose, select; young + Biniss (afr amer dialect 'business')
+ bns (1149) aramaic anger (from root in pn for perplex'd, turn'd?) + eye? or son of Samekh?
Another quotation from the movie »Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum.« But I was thinking, If you're preparing for war, you're pre-preparing for Shalom, Islam, Salomé, etc.
Carlos's French is replaced by Buckaroo Banzai with English, the lingua pura according to Dan Brown, Da Vinci Code, sc the language of fire, persian truth "ash." The new Emperor (a non-Emperor?) speaks to men not French, the language of European civilizational pride(?), but the language of the chandalas, who see the truth (the unity of the dualism, Persia) but in a burnt out condition, 'ash' in our sense, as if no improvement is possible, perspectiveless value-neutrality of deadness is the only intelligible valuation.
Men hitherto introduce new content otherness into Canaan for routinization in "the female drama" (cf Plato, Republic; also Strauss, Aristophanes and Socrates) for routinization. Men made this contribution into Mensch e.g. by philosophy [below, in the piraeus], to which "women" make no contribution feminists emphasize (this in the era when Heidegger has proposed that philosophy cease, replaced by 'other thinking' [to which 'women' can contribute or even dominate?]). Feminists sort-of imply that women were prevented by the patriarchy from participating in philosophy, but seem more certain when they allege that philosophy has been made by men in a patriarchal way that excludes 'women's ways of knowing' etc, as by separating reason and emotion, etc. Which actually sounds 'sexist' -- why should emotional reasoners be promoted into technocratic structures such as law, engineering, scientific research etc?
Keep the faith in the war on the military-industrial complex!
The dualism of English as persian fire maybe indicated by the language as a vocabulary hodgepodge, also a fusion of Germanic and Romance, European Canaan and European civilisation? if only Anglo-Saxony chandalas could see with persepctive!
England, Angle[bent nail]: ?js5230f NKL perfidious.
Blake's "perfidious Albion" maybe a reference to the Roman Albino treated by Machiavelli in Prince ?19.
But, really, mere perfidy is too universal to be claim'd by or for the English. Perhaps a certain sort of perfidy is indicated for Englishness. Maybe unconscious "innocent" perfidy?
Post a Comment