ex cathedra: Who could resist? ;)

Friday, April 29, 2011

Who could resist? ;)

PS. I decided to follow the link to the skool. Here's the homepage.

Metamessage: feminist courses in leaving your balls at the door.

Reminded me of the resentful angry women I met in church and theological life. In his book Wildmen, Warriors and Kings, even back in the early 90's, deceased (and gay) Jesuit Patrick Arnold pointed out the male-hatred of female theologians, many of whom got to vent their anger at male seminarians.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...: But less weight gain than with a summer devoted to Baskin Robbins. er; 12:19 PM, April 30, 2011
Anonymous said...: Unless by "Who could resist?" you mean you're looking for a summer devoted to marching and Resistance! against the temptation of Baskin Robbins. er; 12:21 PM, April 30, 2011

Post a Comment

Toward Our Future

What the sons of Europa need is a new religion: one that is as tribal, portable and survivalist as Judaism, as masculine, terrestrial and tough as Islam and as intellectually and aesthetically creative as Christianity...with a dose of the unflinching realism of the ancestral ways of the Greeks and Romans, Germans and Celts and Slavs..And for the larger Indo-European frame, something of the Indian capacity to combine an ultimate and philosophical realization of The One with a robustly mytho-poetic religion on-the-ground. Oh, and some of the psychological acumen of Buddhism.

Liberalism's Basic Flaw

Liberals believe that the chief role of the State is to force everyone to be equal, (ie, take vengeance on the successful). So when they are confronted with any group that they deem less well off than themselves, they are morally disarmed, completely and utterly. Any group that can achieve Victim Status is on their way to power and the (White) liberal's only job is to give them what they want, no matter how much that damages him. And nothing may ever be expected, much less demanded, of them in return. It's a recipe for suicide: no other outcome is possible.